The Impact of Insider Trading on Market Efficiency
Multiple studies demonstrate the negative consequences of insider trading to markets. Insider trading may compromise liquidity and efficiency by preventing prices from reacting appropriately to new information.
Additionally, this situation deprives investors who lack nonpublic information of the value of their securities at fair value and creates incentives for people to break the law.
Liquidity
Liquidity is an integral element of market efficiency. It facilitates arbitrage activities and enables price convergence to a random walk benchmark; however, liquidity has limits. One concern regarding insider trading could distort liquidity by decreasing potential buyers or increasing prices; additionally it may cause wealth shift from outsiders to insiders which poses an issue for long-term investors and small shareholders alike.
Previous studies have identified how insider trades affect stock characteristics such as price, return and volume. In this investigation of insider buy-and-sell transactions affecting these characteristics, specifically by calculating any abnormal values associated with each characteristic. Studies indicate that stock characteristics respond differently to sell and buy transactions of various types of insiders, providing evidence to support the semi-strong form efficient market hypothesis. Results from this study also indicate that insider trades could motivate managers to prematurely disclose information (Bainbridge 2002), delay it so as to arrange stock trades (Schotland 1967) or undertake risky projects that boost trading profits but reduce corporate value (Easterbrook 1981). Such issues should be dealt with by regulatory bodies.
Informational efficiency
This study seeks to assess the impact of insider trading on market efficiency. We use daily event study methodology to examine its effect on stock price, return and volume. Furthermore, abnormal returns, prices and volumes for various categories of insider traders will be calculated so as to ascertain whether their changes are predictable by outside investors.
We discover that insider trading increases price-to-book ratio and firm market capitalization, and that its magnitude depends on the category of trade conducted. Furthermore, the market reacts differently when considering insider purchases versus sales; buying transactions are likely to generate stronger responses than selling ones.
Although studies on informational efficiency abound, no one has agreed on an ideal government policy regarding insider trading. One common argument holds that banning insider trading reduces informed investors and thus decreases market pricing efficiency; however, this view has several limitations; for instance, it would be impossible to monitor all non-insider trades made and their impact on stock prices.
Efficiency of market makers
Market makers serve as intermediaries between investors, matching buyers and sellers and setting prices in an attempt to generate profits for both sides. Their income comes from earning the spread between their purchase price and sell price – this profit stems from providing liquidity as well as their ability to hedge and arbitrage – as well as inventory revenue from dividends or interest payments they hold onto for themselves.
Insider trading refers to any exchange of non-publicly available information, such as when large shareholders obtain private knowledge about a company facing legal proceedings and sell shares prior to this news being made public; this practice can impede liquidity and efficiency on markets.
Prior studies have established that insider trading affects stock characteristics – price, return and volume – in various ways. We investigate these effects using an event study method on data from China NEEQ which uses market-making as its trading system.
Market integrity
Market integrity refers to trading activities that adhere to ethical standards and laws, preventing fraudulent practices and providing fairness for all participants. Upholding market integrity promotes investor trust, stable markets and economic growth while protecting investors from scams or manipulation that may threaten financial systems negatively. One way of upholding market integrity is with full delivery shares which provide direct ownership while decreasing risks related to fraudulent practices or manipulations.
Insider trading studies reveal that trading on inside information generates positive abnormal returns and has predictive powers. Outsiders can emulate insider trades to make abnormal profits themselves; not all insider trades are equally lucrative, however; some may prove more profitable than others. In this research study, various categories of insiders trades were examined to analyze their effect on price, abnormal return, volume trading volumes as well as price-specific factors. It provides key insights into detecting and understanding their influence over prices and trading volumes.